Weboh wrote:
Splitwirez wrote:
It requires Visual Styles, but nobody said it requires DWM...
(Hint: Using a Basic theme won't kill your battery AFAIK, and will still let you use the Taskbar Skinning Functionality)
Right, but the classic theme is the only non-DWM visual style that I know of that lets you change colors for the titlebar and stuff. If I use any other visual style, I have the skinned taskbar with a completely different--even different color--titlebar and such.
Did you actually just say that?
The Classic Theme isn't a Visual Style, it's a complete lack thereof. That's why it doesn't allow Taskbar skinning
Weboh wrote:
Splitwirez wrote:
Actually the OS is irrelevant, though 8.1 and 10 may require a second fix for Classic Theme with DWM...
Again, true; I have Windows 7 and it works with every theme but classic. But doing this fix to make it work with the classic theme would only benefit Windows 7 users. And Ivo has said before that Windows 7 users are the minority among CS users. (He said that about adding in support for on-the-fly gradients so that a .skin can match the titlebar, which eventually got added in sooo....)
Splitwirez wrote:
Classic AE would do it, but you'd lose the colorization options because...well...it's a Visual Style .-.
Not to mention it would still drain my battery.
And it looks ugly.
My point remains - some people use the Classic Theme on Windows 8.1 and I wouldn't be surprised if a tiny portion do even on 10... >.>
(FYI I mean the Classic Theme, not some replica of it such as Classic AE or those horrifying Aerolite colour schemes)
And yeah, Classic AE isn't as pretty as it could be...also idk if Classic AE supports Basic, but if it does, using it as a Basic Style wouldn't drain your battery. So there's that.