Well, I agree that there are usability concerns for a completely transparent taskbar, so I have a rainmeter skin creating a gradient shadow behind the icons, so I don't have an issue with that, my issue is that aesthetically the transparent taskbar only looks good until you maximize a window, at which point it looks quite odd. Personally, I don't think that an update on transparency from say 100% transparent, to opaque dark gray, would be distracting, it would simply solidify the visual presented by maximizing a window, hiding any part of the desktop that shows through the task bar, and that the taskbar being transparent when only the desktop is visible makes the digital environment feel open and less cramped.
With regards to performance, while this website has opened my eyes to the word of people who are quite happy with the way windows was in vista, xp, and before, and even want it to go back to being visually the same as it was then, we live in a world where people have dual (or higher) graphics card configurations, chip sets are overclocked to 6+ GHz, and I'm typing this on what is techincally a tablet with 8 Gb of RAM and an i7 processor, with a 256 Gb SSD, a tablet running windows 10 that can run chrome with 50+ tabs and fetch 1080p web content from youtube servers somewhere else in the world and its integrated graphics (that sadden me greatly) can display them without stuttering. I'm sure there are plenty of people out there who have computers that may have issues with updating a single color value (or depending on how the data is formatted, just an alpha or transparency value) repeatedly and very rapidly, upon user input, I'm also sure that plenty of computers can handle it more easily than 99% of what their users put them through daily.
I think the main concerns are really 1) usability (I personally happen to have this sorted out for my particular use case, but that means little to others, who may have other use cases), but then, transparency is an existing feature, my point was sort of just that this would make full, or even partial transparency, more usable, and improve the UI 2) feasibility and value: Ivo would have to code this and it quite frankly wouldn't be that big of an improvement for that many people (relative to what Ivo said it would require in order to implement)
However, I don't think performance, or distraction are an issue, though I'm sure some one, if really dedicated to making an ugly desktop, could do something like make it go from neon green to bright red, and I'm sure that would be distracting, but as an interface designer, there are plenty of ways one could take advantage of a feature like this, without it being at all unpleasant, in fact, Chrome OS does exactly this and it's quite attractive (unfortunately the rest of the UI isn't as attractive and polished as google's other platform, android, but hey, we'll see if it improves with more time)
All of my long winded ramblings aside, I believe Ivo has expressed his feelings that, within the parameters of this piece of software and it's intended goals, it isn't worth implementation (also, correct me if I'm wrong about that Ivo, I don't mean to put words in your mouth, and if that isn't how you feel, I do apologize), which is understandable given my understanding of what would, or rather, might, be required to implement this feature. However, that leaves me attempting to figure how I might simulate this kind of UI behavior, so I'll probably try to get in touch with the devs at DisplayFusion and get their input, regarding feasibility, and potential implementation.
|