I am a UX/usability purist. I focus on using what offers me the most productive, fast, usable, full-featured, rich, customizable and enjoyable experience. I see some unique features of XP which still make me want to use it and then I see Windows 7 innovations (or rather Vista innovations which made it into Windows 7). I do still use Windows XP but I am trying to unify the experiences using Classic Shell and other third party apps so I can be satisfied with a single product. I have no plans of completely leaving Windows XP any time soon, but I do use Windows 7 as well.
I love the search in the Start Menu, I wrote an article about it:
viewtopic.php?f=4&t=1588 but I can't stand how Vista/7 made the All Programs functionality of the Start Menu worse. I am not a fan of the new Windows 7 Taskbar but 7+ Taskbar Tweaker fixes that. I am not happy how file association functionality has progressively been crippled in newer Windows versions. I liked Luna, I liked Classic too but I like Aero more. But then Vista/7 have these unacceptable regressions in major parts of the OS such as Windows Explorer or the way servicing/updates are handled. The breadcrumbs is fine but then regressions such as the
ones that happened in Vista or
in Windows 7 are not OK. Sure, the internals of Windows have improved - graphics, networking, security, memory management, I/O but that hasn't translated into a better user experience.
Windows XP is kind of hard to defeat overall, it is a legendary OS but Classic Shell and a
dozen other third party apps, make Vista/Windows 7
almost worthwhile. Windows 8 is another giant sadness that may be hard for Microsoft to ever recover from unless they take Ivo's or my help in fixing Windows.
Then again Microsoft doesn't seem to care about having a great user experience as long as their bottom line is profitable. They were "successful" despite creating a mediocre product such as Windows 7, in between the two failures - Vista and Windows 8.